top of page

It's My Birthday, and I'll Write If I Want To

68 Revolutions Around the Sun—and the Question of Legacy

Yes, that’s me with my sister June, brother Craig, cousin Candy, and others.
Yes, that’s me with my sister June, brother Craig, cousin Candy, and others.

This past Friday, I turned 68—and with it came a question that feels more present now than ever:

What, if anything, of a life endures?


A friend of mine, Jaimen, says it in a way I’ve come to love: this marks my 68th revolution around the sun. There is something about that image that feels far more meaningful to me than simply stating my age. It places a human life back into the larger order of things. It reminds me that a birthday is not merely the counting of years, but the completion of a cycle—one more revolution through light, darkness, season, memory, and change.


A revolution is not a straight line. It is a return, though never to the exact same place. The Earth circles the sun, and yet nothing remains as it was. The child becomes the young man, the young man becomes the older man, and the older man, if he is fortunate, begins to see that time does not simply pass over us. It shapes us. It reveals us. It strips away what was superficial and leaves us face to face with what is essential.


That, perhaps, is one of the deepest truths of aging.


When we are young, we tend to think of life in terms of acquisition. We are occupied with becoming, building, striving, proving. We imagine our lives as something ahead of us, something still waiting to be assembled. But somewhere along these revolutions, without announcement, the question changes.


We become less concerned with what we can gather and more concerned with what will remain.


The inward question is no longer just What will I do with my life? It becomes: What of my life will endure?


As I have completed this 68th revolution around the sun, that question has become more present for me.


What will I leave behind?


It is not a morbid question. At least, I do not experience it that way. It feels instead like one of the most honest questions a person can ask. Mortality has a way of clarifying things. It reminds us that much of what preoccupies us is temporary, and perhaps was always meant to be. So much of what fills our days—our labor, our routines, our obligations, our successes, our disappointments—belongs to the world of passing necessity. It matters while we are here, but not all of it travels forward.


I have spent a large part of my professional life in busienss of dressing naked windows. It has been real work, serious work, the kind of work that helps sustain a family, a home, and a life. There is dignity in that. There is no shame in work that is practical, earthly, and necessary.


But it sustained a life. It did not define its meaning.


I know that when I am gone, few, if any, will remember me for that part of my life. It is not where my deepest imprint lies.


What may remain are the words.


The novels.

The essays.

The Substack posts.


The pages on which I tried to record not only stories, but a way of seeing.


That realization brings me to something I have come to understand more deeply as I have grown older: writing is not only an act of creation. It is an act of continuation. It is a way of extending consciousness beyond the limits of one lifetime.


The body leaves. The voice goes silent. The rooms we inhabited pass to others. But words can cross that threshold. Words can survive us. They can carry tone, insight, longing, conviction, wonder. They can preserve not just what we thought, but how we were.


That may be the closest thing we have to leaving a trail of the soul.


I do not mean that grandly. I mean it with humility. To write sincerely is to leave behind evidence of an inward life. It is to say: this is how the world appeared to me. This is what moved me. This is what I feared. This is what I loved. This is what I could not stop searching for.


And if someone, years from now, opens one of my books or reads one of these posts, perhaps they will not only encounter an idea or a story. Perhaps they will encounter a presence. Perhaps they will feel, however faintly, the shape of the man who wrote it.


That thought moves me.


Because what is legacy, really?


It is easy to confuse legacy with recognition. We live in a culture that teaches us to think of legacy in terms of scale—how many people knew your name, how much influence you had, how visible you became, how much you accumulated.


But I suspect that true legacy is something quieter and more intimate than that.


Legacy is not fame. It is what remains when everything else falls away.


It is the imprint of your inner life upon the lives of others.


It may live in the memory of those who loved you. It may live in the values you passed on. It may live in a sentence that helps a stranger feel less alone. It may live in a novel that awakens wonder in someone not yet born when you wrote it.


Legacy is not always public. Often it is invisible, almost hidden, like roots beneath the soil. Yet it nourishes what comes after.


That, to me, is a comforting thought.


I have come to believe that every human life leaves traces, whether or not the world notices. Most of what we are vanishes outwardly. The body ages and fails. The roles we played are taken up by others. The practical details of our labor fade.


But something essential does continue—not only in a spiritual sense, which I believe, but in the quieter earthly sense that we live on in what we have made, in what we have given language to, in what we have dared to express honestly.


This is why creative work matters so much to me.


A novel is more than a story. At its best, it is a vessel for perception. It carries not only plot and character, but temperament, intuition, longing, and the quiet architecture of a mind trying to understand the world.

The same is true of essays like these.


A Substack post may seem small in the moment of writing it, but over time, such pieces become markers of a life examined. Together they form a record of one mind moving through the world—trying to make sense of beauty, suffering, mystery, history, time, and the strange privilege of being alive at all.


That matters to me more now than it once did.


When I was younger, I may have thought more in terms of achievement. Now I think more in terms of transmission.


What am I passing on?


What am I giving form to before I go?


What part of my life can be carried forward by someone else?


I find myself wanting not simply to have lived, but to have articulated something of the meaning of living—not definitively, not as doctrine, but as witness. As offering.


As one man’s attempt to say: this is what it felt like to be Neil Perry Gordon moving through this particular stretch of earthly time, drawn always toward story, toward beauty, toward wonder, toward the hidden depths beneath visible life.


Perhaps that is all any writer can do.


We cannot defeat death by writing. But we can answer it.


We can refuse to vanish completely.


We can leave behind language that bears our imprint, stories that continue to breathe, reflections that go on asking questions after we are gone.


There is something profoundly human in that gesture. Perhaps even something sacred.


The written word becomes a kind of bridge between the finite and the enduring. It says: I was here, and I was awake. I noticed. I wrestled. I imagined. I tried to tell the truth as I saw it.


What more can any of us really hope for?


As I complete this 68th revolution around the sun, I feel gratitude—deep gratitude—for having been given time, for having been given work, for having been given creative longing, and for having had the chance to shape some part of that longing into words.


I do not know how many more revolutions remain.


But I know this:


The older I grow, the less I want to leave behind mere evidence that I existed, and the more I want to leave behind evidence that I was conscious of existence—that I was engaged by it, humbled by it, enlarged by it, and determined to answer it with whatever measure of thought and imagination I possessed.


If, someday, someone reads my novels or these reflections and comes away understanding not only what I wrote but something of how I beheld the world, then I will have left behind what matters most to me.


Not a profession.

Not a résumé.

Not the visible machinery of a career.


But a voice.A sensibility.A record of wonder.A map of the questions that accompanied me through my revolutions around the sun.


And if something in those words lives on—in the mind of another, in the quiet of another life—then this life has done what it was meant to do.

 
 
 

Recent Posts

See All
bottom of page